MEMS-enabled silicon photonic integrated devices and circuits

Photonic integrated circuits have seen a dramatic increase in complexity over the past decades. This development has been spurred by recent applications in datacenter communications and enabled by the availability of standardized mature technology platforms. Mechanical movement of wave-guiding structures at the micro- and nanoscale provides unique opportunities to further enhance functionality and to reduce power consumption in photonic integrated circuits. We here demonstrate integration of MEMS-enabled components in a simplified silicon photonics process based on IMEC's Standard iSiPP50G Silicon Photonics Platform and a custom release process

Increased susceptibility to proactive interference in adults with dyslexia?

Recent findings show that people with dyslexia have an impairment in serial-order memory. Based on these findings, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that people with dyslexia have difficulties dealing with proactive interference (PI) in recognition memory. A group of 25 adults with dyslexia and a group of matched controls were subjected to a 2-back recognition task, which required participants to indicate whether an item (mis)matched the item that had been presented 2 trials before. PI was elicited using lure trials in which the item matched the item in the 3-back position instead of the targeted 2-back position. Our results demonstrate that the introduction of lure trials affected 2-back recognition performance more severely in the dyslexic group than in the control group, suggesting greater difficulty in resisting PI in dyslexia.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio

Low-power, low-penalty, flip-chip integrated, 10Gb/s ring-based 1V CMOS photonics transmitter

Modulation with 7.5dB transmitter penalty is demonstrated from a novel 1.5Vpp differential CMOS driver flip-chip integrated with a Si ring modulator, consuming 350fJ/bit from a single 1V supply at bit rates up to 10Gb/s

The KB paradigm and its application to interactive configuration

The knowledge base paradigm aims to express domain knowledge in a rich formal language, and to use this domain knowledge as a knowledge base to solve various problems and tasks that arise in the domain by applying multiple forms of inference. As such, the paradigm applies a strict separation of concerns between information and problem solving. In this paper, we analyze the principles and feasibility of the knowledge base paradigm in the context of an important class of applications: interactive configuration problems. In interactive configuration problems, a configuration of interrelated objects under constraints is searched, where the system assists the user in reaching an intended configuration. It is widely recognized in industry that good software solutions for these problems are very difficult to develop. We investigate such problems from the perspective of the KB paradigm. We show that multiple functionalities in this domain can be achieved by applying different forms of logical inferences on a formal specification of the configuration domain. We report on a proof of concept of this approach in a real-life application with a banking company. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP

Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer pada Mata Kuliah Pastry di Jurusan Ilmu Kesejahteraan Keluarga Fakultas Pariwisata dan Perhotelan Universitas Negeri Padang

The aims of this study was to develop a computer-based learning media is valid and practical course on pastry in the ca of IKK FPP UNP. This study uses Research And Development (R & D) is the method used to produce a specific product and test the feasibility of the product. Products produced in the form of computer-based learning media in the Department of IKK FPP UNP. Data collection techniques in this study conducted using questionnaires given to lecturers caterers and questionnaire responses of students to the media developed and analyzed using analysis deskripstif which includes analysis of the validity, and analysis of the practicalities. The results of this study indicate that the validity of computer-based learning media on valid category (0.89). While the practicalities of the test, the lecturer / practitioner gives very practical category (92.7%) and students leave with a very practical category (88.7%). Based on these findings it can be concluded that computer-based learning media is valid and practical to be used as a medium of learning in the subject of Pastry

Silicon photonic MEMS add-drop filter

We demonstrate a compact add-drop filter based on a MEMS ring resonator implemented in IMEC's iSiPP50G silicon photonics platform. The device exhibits a port extinction of 20 dB and a port isolation of > 50 dB, upon actuation range of 0 V to 27 V

Spin-dependent resonant tunneling through semimetallic ErAs quantum wells

Resonant tunneling through semimetallic ErAs quantum wells embedded in GaAs structures with AlAs barriers was recently found to exhibit an intriguing behavior in magnetic fields which is explained in terms of tunneling selection rules and the spin-polarized band structure including spin-orbit coupling.Comment: 4 pages, figures supplied as self-unpacking figures.uu, uses epsfig.sty to incorporate figures in preprin

Low-voltage silicon photonic MEMS switch with vertical actuation

We present a vertically movable silicon photonic MEMS switch realized in IMEC's standard silicon photonics platform followed by a dedicated postprocessing for MEMS release. The device has six optical ports, which enable four switching configurations with a safe electrical isolation of the switch's actuator. A low actuation voltage of 3.75 V is required to efficiently switch the optical signal from the drop port to the through port of the device. The device exhibits port extinctions of 16 dB and 26 dB at its OFF and ON states, respectively. With an insertion loss of 35 nm, this component paves the way for low-power scalable circuits in MEMS-enabled silicon photonics

Programmable photonic circuits

[EN] The growing maturity of integrated photonic technology makes it possible to build increasingly large and complex photonic circuits on the surface of a chip. Today, most of these circuits are designed for a specific application, but the increase in complexity has introduced a generation of photonic circuits that can be programmed using software for a wide variety of functions through a mesh of on-chip waveguides, tunable beam couplers and optical phase shifters. Here we discuss the state of this emerging technology, including recent developments in photonic building blocks and circuit architectures, as well as electronic control and programming strategies. We cover possible applications in linear matrix operations, quantum information processing and microwave photonics, and examine how these generic chips can accelerate the development of future photonic circuits by providing a higher-level platform for prototyping novel optical functionalities without the need for custom chip fabricationBogaerts, W.; Pérez-López, D.; Capmany Francoy, J.; Miller, DAB.; Poon, J.; Englund, D.; Morichetti, F.... (2020). Programmable photonic circuits. Nature. 586(7828):207-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2764-0S2072165867828Chen, X. et al. The emergence of silicon photonics as a flexible technology platform. Proc. IEEE 106, 2101–2116 (2018).Smit, M., Williams, K. & van der Tol, J. Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integration. APL Photonics 4, 050901 (2019).Capmany, J. & Perez, D. Programmable Integrated Photonics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020). The first book on the subject of programmable photonics gives a detailed overview of the fundamental principles, architectures and potential applications.Marpaung, D., Yao, J. & Capmany, J. Integrated microwave photonics. Nat. Photon. 13, 80–90 (2019).Zhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K. & Lowery, A. J. Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica 2, 854–859 (2015).Shen, Y. et al. Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 11, 441–446 (2017).Harris, N. C. et al. Linear programmable nanophotonic processors. Optica 5, 1623–1631 (2018). One of the largest-scale demonstrations of a programmable photonic circuit, using a silicon photonics forward-only mesh that maps 26 input modes onto 26 output modes, for use in deep learning and quantum information processing.Miller, D. A. B. Self-configuring universal linear optical component. Photon. Res. 1, 1–15 (2013). This foundational paper in the field of programmable photonics is the first to bring together waveguide meshes with self-configuration algorithms that require no active computation, including the concept of the self-aligning beam coupler.Carolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349, 711–716 (2015).Harris, N. C. et al. Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon. Nanophotonics 5, 456–468 (2016).Notaros, J. et al. Programmable dispersion on a photonic integrated circuit for classical and quantum applications. Opt. Express 25, 21275–21285 (2017).Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S. & Walmsley, I. A. An optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica 12, 1460–1465 (2016).Perez-Lopez, D. Programmable integrated silicon photonics waveguide meshes: optimized designs and control algorithms. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 8301312 (2020).Ribeiro, A., Ruocco, A., Vanacker, L. & Bogaerts, W. Demonstration of a 4×4-port universal linear circuit. Optica 3, 1348–1357 (2016).Harris, N. C. et al. Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nat. Photon. 11, 447–452 (2017).Mennea, P. L. et al. Modular linear optical circuits. Optica 5, 1087–1090 (2018).Taballione, C. et al. 8×8 programmable quantum photonic processor based on silicon nitride waveguides. In Frontiers in Optics, JTu3A.58 (Optical Society of America, 2018). A demonstration of an 8 × 8 forward-only programmable linear circuit in silicon nitride that benefits from the notably low optical losses of this material and is therefore attractive for linear quantum operations on single photons.Perez, D. et al. Silicon photonics rectangular universal interferometer. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1700219 (2017).Xie, Y. et al. Programmable optical processor chips: toward photonic RF filters with DSP-level flexibility and MHz-band selectivity. Nanophotonics 7, 421–454 (2017). A comprehensive overview of the various ways in which a programmable photonic circuit can be used to process microwave signals, and on how this type of circuit is transitioning from custom ASPICs to generic programmable PICs.Hall, T. J. & Hasan, M. Universal discrete Fourier optics RF photonic integrated circuit architecture. Opt. Express 24, 7600–7610 (2016).Dyakonov, I. V. et al. Reconfigurable photonics on a glass chip. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044048 (2018).Shokraneh, F., Geoffroy-Gagnon, S., Nezami, M. S. & Liboiron-Ladouceur, O. A single layer neural network implemented by a 4×4 MZI-based optical processor. IEEE Photonics J. 11, 4501612 (2019).Lu, L., Zhou, L. & Chen, J. Programmable SCOW mesh silicon photonic processor for linear unitary operator. Micromachines 10, 646 (2019).Qiang, X. et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat. Photon. 12, 534–539 (2018).Wang, J. et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science 360, 285–291 (2018).Schaeff, C., Polster, R., Huber, M., Ramelow, S. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental access to higher-dimensional entangled quantum systems using integrated optics. Optica 2, 523–529 (2015).Shadbolt, P. J. et al. Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Nat. Photon. 6, 45–49 (2012).Miller, D. A. B. Waves, modes, communications, and optics: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 11, 679 (2019).Miller, D. A. B. Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Opt. Express 21, 6360–6370 (2013).Miller, D. A. B. Perfect optics with imperfect components. Optica 2, 747–750 (2015).Annoni, A. et al. Unscrambling light—automatically undoing strong mixing between modes. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17110 (2017). Early demonstration of a forward-only programmable mesh used to unmix different modes in a waveguide, implementing integrated transparent detectors that measure the light intensity in the waveguide without inducing additional optical loss.Pai, S. et al. Parallel programming of an arbitrary feedforward photonic network. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 6100813 (2020).Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994).Wang, M., Alves, A. R., Xing, Y. & Bogaerts, W. Tolerant, broadband tunable 2×2 coupler circuit. Opt. Express 28, 5555–5566 (2020).Pérez-López, D., Gutierrez, A. M., Sánchez, E., DasMahapatra, P. & Capmany, J. Integrated photonic tunable basic units using dual-drive directional couplers. Opt. Express 27, 38071 (2019).Choutagunta, K., Roberts, I., Miller, D. A. B. & Kahn, J. M. Adapting Mach–Zehnder mesh equalizers in direct-detection mode-division-multiplexed links. J. Light. Technol. 38, 723–735 (2020).Miller, D. A. B. Analyzing and generating multimode optical fields using self-configuring networks. Optica 7, 794–801 (2020).Morizur, J.-F. et al. Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 2524 (2010).Labroille, G. et al. Efficient and mode selective spatial mode multiplexer based on multi-plane light conversion. Opt. Express 22, 15599–15607 (2014).Tanomura, R., Tang, R., Ghosh, S., Tanemura, T. & Nakano, T. Robust integrated optical unitary converter using multiport directional couplers. J. Light. Technol. 38, 60–66 (2020).Miller, D. A. B. Setting up meshes of interferometers – reversed local light interference method. Opt. Express 25, 29233 (2017).Li, H. W. et al. Calibration and high fidelity measurement of a quantum photonic chip. New J. Phys. 15, 063017 (2013).Cong, G. et al. Arbitrary reconfiguration of universal silicon photonic circuits by bacteria foraging algorithm to achieve reconfigurable photonic digital-to-analog conversion. Opt. Express 27, 24914 (2019).Pérez, D. et al. Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–9 (2017). The first experimental demonstration of a recirculating waveguide mesh with seven unit cells that can be programmed to perform more than a hundred different functions.Pérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Field-programmable photonic arrays. Opt. Express 26, 27265 (2018).Rahim, A., Spuesens, T., Baets, R. & Bogaerts, W. Open-access silicon photonics: current status and emerging initiatives. Proc. IEEE 106, 2313–2330 (2018).Munoz, P. et al. Foundry developments toward silicon nitride photonics from visible to the mid-infrared. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 8200513 (2019).Teng, M. et al. Miniaturized silicon photonics devices for integrated optical signal processors. J. Light. Technol. 38, 6–17 (2020).Sacher, W. D. et al. Monolithically integrated multilayer silicon nitride-on-silicon waveguide platforms for 3-D photonic circuits and devices. Proc. IEEE 106, 2232–2245 (2018).Baudot, C. et al. Developments in 300mm silicon photonics using traditional CMOS fabrication methods and materials. In 2017 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting, 765–768 (IEEE, 2017).Fahrenkopf, N. M. et al. The AIM photonics MPW: a highly accessible cutting edge technology for rapid prototyping of photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 8201406 (2019).Chiles, J. et al. Multi-planar amorphous silicon photonics with compact interplanar couplers, cross talk mitigation, and low crossing loss. APL Photonics 2, 116101 (2017).Van Campenhout, J., Green, W. M. J., Assefa, S. & Vlasov, Y. A. Integrated NiSi waveguide heaters for CMOS-compatible silicon thermo-optic devices. Opt. Lett. 35, 1013–1015 (2010).Masood, A. et al. Comparison of heater architectures for thermal control of silicon photonic circuits. In Proc. 10th Int. Conference on Group IV Photonics 83–84 (IEEE, 2013).Milanizadeh, M., Aguiar, D., Melloni, A. & Morichetti, F. Canceling thermal cross-talk effects in photonic integrated circuits. J. Light. Technol. 37, 1325–1332 (2019).Soref, R. A. & Bennett, B. R. Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23, 123–129 (1987).Reed, G. T., Mashanovich, G., Gardes, F. Y. & Thomson, D. J. Silicon optical modulators. Nat. Photon. 4, 518–526 (2010); corrigendum 4, 660 (2010).Memon, F. A. et al. Silicon oxycarbide platform for integrated photonics. J. Light. Technol. 38, 784–791 (2020).Jin, W., Polcawich, R. G., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Piezoelectrically tuned silicon nitride ring resonator. Opt. Express 26, 3174–3187 (2018).Hosseini, N. et al. Stress-optic modulator in TriPleX platform using a piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin film. Opt. Express 23, 14018 (2015).De Cort, W., Beeckman, J., Claes, T., Neyts, K. & Baets, R. Wide tuning of silicon-on-insulator ring resonators with a liquid crystal cladding. Opt. Lett. 36, 3876–3878 (2011).Xing, Y. et al. Digitally controlled phase shifter using an SOI slot waveguide with liquid crystal infiltration. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27, 1269–1272 (2015).Abel, S. et al. Large Pockels effect in micro- and nanostructured barium titanate integrated on silicon. Nat. Mater. 18, 42–47 (2019).Desiatov, B., Shams-Ansari, A., Zhang, M., Wang, C. & Lončar, M. Ultra-low-loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate. Optica 6, 380 (2019).Alexander, K. et al. Nanophotonic Pockels modulators on a silicon nitride platform. Nat. Commun. 9, 3444 (2018).Leuthold, J. et al. Silicon-organic hybrid electro-optical devices. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 114–126 (2013).Errando-Herranz, C. et al. MEMS for photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 8200916 (2020).Quack, N. et al. MEMS-enabled silicon photonic integrated devices and circuits. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 56, 8400210 (2020).Hoessbacher, C. et al. The plasmonic memristor: a latching optical switch. Optica 1, 198 (2014).Ríos, C. et al. Integrated all-photonic non-volatile multi-level memory. Nat. Photon. 9, 725–732 (2015).Wuttig, M., Bhaskaran, H. & Taubner, T. Phase-change materials for non-volatile photonic applications. Nat. Photon. 11, 465–476 (2017).Morichetti, F. et al. Non-invasive on-chip light observation by contactless waveguide conductivity monitoring. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 292–301 (2014).Jayatilleka, H., Shoman, H., Chrostowski, L. & Shekhar, S. Photoconductive heaters enable control of large-scale silicon photonic ring resonator circuits. Optica 6, 84–91 (2019).Grillanda, S. et al. Non-invasive monitoring and control in silicon photonics using CMOS integrated electronics. Optica 1, 129 (2014).Annoni, A. et al. Automated routing and control of silicon photonic switch fabrics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 169–176 (2016).Dumais, P. et al. Silicon photonic switch subsystem with 900 monolithically integrated calibration photodiodes and 64-fiber package. J. Light. Technol. 36, 233–238 (2018).Chen, H., Luo, X. & Poon, A. W. Cavity-enhanced photocurrent generation by 1.55 μm wavelengths linear absorption in a p–i–n diode embedded silicon microring resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 171111 (2009).Ribeiro, A. & Bogaerts, W. Digitally controlled multiplexed silicon photonics phase shifter using heaters with integrated diodes. Opt. Express 25, 29778 (2017).Zimmermann, L. et al. BiCMOS silicon photonics platform. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Th4E-5 (Optical Society of America, 2015).Orcutt, J. S. et al. Nanophotonic integration in state-of-the-art CMOS foundries. Opt. Express 19, 2335–2346 (2011).Stojanović, V. et al. Monolithic silicon-photonic platforms in state-of-the-art CMOS SOI processes. Opt. Express 26, 13106 (2018).Carroll, L. et al. Photonic packaging: transforming silicon photonic integrated circuits into photonic devices. Appl. Sci. 6, 426 (2016).Patterson, D., De Sousa, I. & Archard, L.-M. The future of packaging with silicon photonics. Chip Scale Rev. 21, 1–10 (2017).Ribeiro, A., Declercq, S., Khan, U., Wang, M. & Van Iseghem, L. Column-row addressing of thermo-optic phase shifters for controlling large silicon photonic circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 6100708 (2020).Pantouvaki, M. et al. Active components for 50 Gb/s NRZ-OOK optical interconnects in a silicon photonics platform. J. Light. Technol. 35, 631–638 (2017).Chen, H. et al. 100-Gbps RZ data reception in 67-GHz Si-contacted germanium waveguide p-i-n photodetectors. J. Light. Technol. 35, 722–726 (2017).Pérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Toward programmable microwave photonics processors. J. Light. Technol. 36, 519–532 (2018).Zoldak, M., Halmo, L., Turkiewicz, J. P., Schumann, S. & Henker, R. Packaging of ultra-high speed optical fiber data interconnects. In Opt. Fibers and Their Applications 2017 10325, 103250R (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017).Willner, A. E., Khaleghi, S., Chitgarha, M. R. & Yilmaz, O. F. All-optical signal processing. J. Light. Technol. 32, 660–680 (2014).Ramirez, J. M. et al. III–V-on-silicon integration: from hybrid devices to heterogeneous photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 6100213 (2020).Liu, A. Y. & Bowers, J. Photonic integration with epitaxial III–V on silicon. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 6000412 (2018).Zhang, J. et al. Transfer-printing-based integration of a III–V-on-silicon distributed feedback laser. Opt. Express 26, 8821–8830 (2018).Thiessen, T. et al. Back-side-on-BOX heterogeneously integrated III–V-on-silicon O-band distributed feedback lasers. J. Light. Technol. 38, 3000–3006 (2020).López, A., Perez, D., DasMahapatra, P. & Capmany, J. Auto-routing algorithm for field-programmable photonic gate arrays. Opt. Express 28, 737–752 (2020).Chen, X., Stroobant, P., Pickavet, M. & Bogaerts, W. Graph representations for programmable photonic circuits. J. Light. Technol. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9056549 (2020).Zand, I. & Bogaerts, W. Effects of coupling and phase imperfections in programmable photonic hexagonal waveguide meshes. Photon. Res. 8, 211–218 (2020).Bogaerts, W. & Rahim, A. Programmable photonics: an opportunity for an accessible large-volume PIC ecosystem. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 1–17 (2020). A simple techno-economic analysis of how general-purpose programmable photonic circuits can reduce the cost of prototyping photonics applications.Dubrovsky, M., Ball, M. & Penkovsky, B. Optical proof of work. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.05193 (2019).Paquot, Y., Schroeder, J., Pelusi, M. D. & Eggleton, B. J. All-optical hash code generation and verification for low latency communications. Opt. Express 21, 23873 (2013).Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 14, 273–284 (2019).Norberg, E. J., Guzzon, R. S., Parker, J. S., Johansson, L. A. & Coldren, L. A. Programmable photonic microwave filters monolithically integrated in InP-InGaAsP. J. Light. Technol. 29, 1611–1619 (2011).Wang, J. et al. Reconfigurable radio-frequency arbitrary waveforms synthesized in a silicon photonic chip. Nat. Commun. 6, 5957 (2015).Burla, M. et al. On-chip CMOS compatible reconfigurable optical delay line with separate carrier tuning for microwave photonic signal processing. Opt. Express 19, 21475 (2011).Liu, L. et al. Photonic measurement of microwave frequency using a silicon microdisk resonator. Opt. Commun. 335, 266–270 (2015).Perez-Lopez, D., Sanchez, E. & Capmany, J. Programmable true-time delay lines using integrated waveguide meshes. J. Light. Technol. 36, 4591–4601 2018.Novak, D. et al. Radio-over-fiber technologies for emerging wireless systems. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 52, 0600311 (2016).Behroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A. M., Wu, M. C. & Boser, B. E. Lidar system architectures and circuits. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 135–142 (2017).Heck, M. J. R. Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering. Nanophotonics 6, 93–107 (2017).Van Acoleyen, K. Efficient light collection and direction-of-arrival estimation using a photonic integrated circuit. Photonics 24, 933–935 (2012).Miller, D. A. B. Establishing optimal wave communication channels automatically. J. Light. Technol. 31, 3987–3994 (2013).Luan, E., Shoman, H., Ratner, D. M., Cheung, K. C. & Chrostowski, L. Silicon photonic biosensors using label-free detection. Sensors 18, 3519 (2018).Subramanian, A. Z. et al. Silicon and silicon nitride photonic circuits for spectroscopic sensing on-a-chip. Photon. Res. 3, B47–B59 (2015).Li, Y. et al. Six-beam homodyne laser Doppler vibrometry based on silicon photonics technology. Opt. Express 26, 3638 (2018).Trimberger, S. M. Three ages of FPGAs: a retrospective on the first thirty years of FPGA technology. Proc. IEEE 103, 318–331 (2015).Mohomed, I. & Dutta, P. The age of DIY and dawn of the maker movement. Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 18, 41–43 (2015).Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 7, 79 (2018).Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).Biamonte, J. et al. Quantum machine learning. Nature 549, 195–202 (2017).Steinbrecher, G. R., Olson, J. P., Englund, D. & Carolan, J. Quantum optical neural networks. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 60 (2019).Miatto, F. M., Epping, M. & Lütkenhaus, N. Hamiltonians for one-way quantum repeaters. Quantum 2, 75 (2018)

The Semi-Chiral Quotient, Hyperkahler Manifolds and T-duality

We study the construction of generalized Kahler manifolds, described purely in terms of N=(2,2) semichiral superfields, by a quotient using the semichiral vector multiplet. Despite the presence of a b-field in these models, we show that the quotient of a hyperkahler manifold is hyperkahler, as in the usual hyperkahler quotient. Thus, quotient manifolds with torsion cannot be constructed by this method. Nonetheless, this method does give a new description of hyperkahler manifolds in terms of two-dimensional N=(2,2) gauged non-linear sigma models involving semichiral superfields and the semichiral vector multiplet. We give two examples: Eguchi-Hanson and Taub-NUT. By T-duality, this gives new gauged linear sigma models describing the T-dual of Eguchi-Hanson and NS5-branes. We also clarify some aspects of T-duality relating these models to N=(4,4) models for chiral/twisted-chiral fields and comment briefly on more general quotients that can give rise to torsion and give an example.Comment: 31 page